Gladwyn d’Souza<p><a href="https://sfba.social/tags/CEQA" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>CEQA</span></a>: Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mitchell Beckloff sided with the <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/treeadvocates" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>treeadvocates</span></a>, ruling that <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/EnvironmentalReport" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>EnvironmentalReport</span></a> was no longer valid. “The court finds the city failed to proceed as required by law when it omitted sufficient analysis of the project’s <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/impacts" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>impacts</span></a> on non-sensitive status species (in a) “deficient” <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/EIR" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>EIR</span></a> of the project’s “cumulative effects.”</p><p><a href="https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-02-14/trees-saved-sidewalk-revamp-los-angeles" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">latimes.com/california/story/2</span><span class="invisible">023-02-14/trees-saved-sidewalk-revamp-los-angeles</span></a></p>