CynthesisToday<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mstdn.social/@stux" class="u-url mention">@<span>stux</span></a></span> </p><p>Could be like the schism of the Southern Baptists... </p><p>Limiting federation with <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/ExtractiveSocialNetworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>ExtractiveSocialNetworks</span></a> as a choice breaks the covenant and banishes the limiting servers. Allowing <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/actors" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>actors</span></a> to vote with their <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/resources" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>resources</span></a> by moving to servers that don&#39;t take extractive resources has a value equal to or greater than the choice of allowing federation with extractive social networks because the choice to move acts as an evolutionary force.</p><p>&quot;Drinking&quot; from the &quot;sugar-water&quot; of easy extractive-sourced money allows the <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Ecosystem" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Ecosystem</span></a> to develop a dependence on and organizing force around the sugar-water and quenches the <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Evolutionary" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Evolutionary</span></a> forces for creating the elements of an alternative <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/SocialEcosystems" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>SocialEcosystems</span></a> or <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/FederatedEcosystems" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>FederatedEcosystems</span></a> that don&#39;t require &quot;sugar-water&quot; (<a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Extractive" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Extractive</span></a> sources).</p><p>Thank you for sharing what is known so far.</p>