Berner Dad for EquALLity<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://sfba.social/@adrake" class="u-url mention">@<span>adrake</span></a></span> This isn’t just about California, so 60.2% and socioeconomic inequity still checks out, though actual “rooftop” solar would support a vehicle wherever it is, but you meant separate solar generation. OK, now let’s do California. How about that gift <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/CPUC" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>CPUC</span></a> gave <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/PGE4me" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>PGE4me</span></a> by replacing <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/nem" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>nem</span></a> with <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/nbt" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>nbt</span></a> as of April 14 — which will screw homeowners — and de-incentivizes solar growth significantly:<br /><a href="https://www.ksby.com/news/in-depth/california-solar-benefits-to-be-slashed-by-new-cpuc-regulation" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">ksby.com/news/in-depth/califor</span><span class="invisible">nia-solar-benefits-to-be-slashed-by-new-cpuc-regulation</span></a></p>