Cosmo<p>Last week I posted a couple idle thoughts about the <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Sacbee" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Sacbee</span></a> editorial board and the apparent influence of some younger board members on their political endorsements. Dueling editorials in the city council District 4 race spell out this dynamic pretty explicitly. </p><p>I think the younger board members make a much more compelling case for Katie Valenzuela's re-election than the wishy-washy 'we're too divided' pitch that the oldsters (aka people my age) make for Phil Pluckebaum. </p><p>The 'official' endorsement highlights one of the problems with our elections, and the thinking that each district just needs to elect a bland well-monied 'centrist' who can pull everyone together. They can not. I think we actually need a bigger more diverse council that better represents the competing ideas and visions that we all have for the city.</p><p><a href="https://sfba.social/tags/sacramento" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>sacramento</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://www.sacbee.com/opinion/election-endorsements/article285305012.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">sacbee.com/opinion/election-en</span><span class="invisible">dorsements/article285305012.html</span></a></p>