Kevin Karhan :verified:<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://climatejustice.social/@KarlHeinzHasliP" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>KarlHeinzHasliP</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodontech.de/@denki" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>denki</span></a></span> </p><p>OFC the even better thing would be to avoid drives as much as possible and install <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/FTTH" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>FTTH</span></a> / <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Fiber" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Fiber</span></a> into every home and let as many people work remotely as they can.</p><ul><li>Cuz we know how to do that <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ng5StJsgffs" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">since 1981</a>!</li></ul><p>Not to mention the economies of scale that a (i.e. PICNIC) <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Minitruck" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Minitruck</span></a> delivering food to dozens if not a hundred households in a single shift has compared to cars.</p><ul><li>OFC their start/stop use-cases are more conducive and their mileage way lower than most cars, so they can easily get away with slow-charging after the shift ends.</li></ul><p>As for <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/ConflictMinerals" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ConflictMinerals</span></a>, just reducing overall consumption if we cannot use them is the way to go.</p><ul><li>Which again means <em>lesser and smaller vehicles</em>!</li></ul>