This article "Bad People" by William Gillis is very good.
It lacks the facts that some people, and not a few, like to live in command and control pyramidal structures. That not everyone is altruistic. That there is bad people,
"those for whom other people are not an extension of their own existence as sites of agency, but objects to be crushed or used."
So realization #1, again and again proved in history, old and current:
"A core anarchist realization is that we cannot guard against bad people by creating institutions of power because the same bad people will inevitably seize and wield those institutions. "
I won't quote it all, but then it goes to police and "simplistic order" structures, how they attract bad people and defend pyramidal hierarchies - often with bad people on top, the risk posed these bad people by decentralisation of communications and large scale coordination and altruistic weapons like boycotts (where you accept to lose personnaly for a better future for the community).
How the bad people are themselves very bad at organic coordination (too much selfishness) and rely on pyramidal power structures.
And thus, of they always drift towards the state and its institutions.
And that's half the article. It 8s really very good.
OK, I get all that. I even get that in an hypothetical world without any pyramidal power structures, you can manage to avoid their awaking with strong and definitive retaliation when some start to appear - even if I don't get how it's done in the whole world, or if only on your communities, how you manage imperialism from others.
But I still don't get how we can go from where we are to that world, even with bottom-up thingy.
And I don't understand either how we can know most people don't want to be part of pyramidal structures.